Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 1: Effects of MeOH and EtOAc extracts of H. formicarum Jack. on cell viability induced by H2O2. A. Effects of MeOH and EtOAc extracts of H. formicarum Jack. (0.1, 1, 5, 10, and 100 μg/mL) on SH-SY5Y cell viability for 24 h exposure; B. Effects of pretreatment of SH-SY5Y cells with MeOH and EtOAc extracts of H. formicarum Jack. on cell viability induced by H2O2. C. Light microscope observation in SH-SY5Y cell treated with MeOH and EtOAc extracts of H. formicarum Jack. in the presence or absence of H2O2 at 20 x magnification. The data are shown as mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer Post Hoc test, ** P<0.01 vs. control, ## P<0.01 vs. 400 μM H2O2-treated group).

Figure 1: Effects of MeOH and EtOAc extracts of <i>H. formicarum</i> Jack. on cell viability induced by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.
A. Effects of MeOH and EtOAc extracts of <i>H. formicarum</i> Jack. (0.1, 1, 5, 10, and 100 μg/mL) on SH-SY5Y cell viability for 24 h exposure; B. Effects of pretreatment of SH-SY5Y cells with MeOH and EtOAc extracts of H. formicarum Jack. on cell viability induced by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. C. Light microscope observation in SH-SY5Y cell treated with MeOH and EtOAc extracts of <i>H. formicarum</i> Jack. in the presence or absence of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> at 20 x magnification. The data are shown as mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer Post Hoc test, ** <i>P</i><0.01 <i>vs</i>. control, <sup>##</sup> <i>P</i><0.01 <i>vs</i>. 400 μM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-treated group).