Impact Factor 2019: 1.940 (@Clarivate Analytics)
5-Year Impact Factor: 1.955 (@Clarivate Analytics)
  • Users Online: 110
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
CONSENSUS
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 335-349

Chinese expert consensus on early prevention and intervention of sepsis


Emergency Medicine Branch of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare; Chinese Society of Emergency Medicine, Chinese Medical Asssociation; China College of Emergency Phsicines, Chinese Medical Dcoctor Association; Emergency Medicine Committee of Chinese People's Liberation Army

Date of Submission12-Jun-2020
Date of Decision24-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance24-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication16-Jul-2020

Correspondence Address:
Chuanzhu Lv
Research Unit of Island Emergency Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No. 2019RU013), Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan; Key Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma of Ministry of Education, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China

Xiaodong Zhao
Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

Xuezhong Yu
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

Yuguo Chen
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

Zhong Wang
Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine of Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This work was supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-023), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1995-7645.289438

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Sepsis is currently a major problem and challenge facing the medical community. With rapid development and progress of modern medicine, researchers have put more and more attention on sepsis; meanwhile, the morbidity and mortality of sepsis remains high despite great efforts from experts in various fields. According to updated guidelines, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Infection is the initial step of sepsis progression, and development from infection to sepsis is a complex pathophysiological process, including pathogen invasion, cytokine release, capillary leakage, microcirculation dysfunction, etc. which finally leads to organ metabolic disorders and functional failure. According to the latest recommended international guidelines of Sepsis 3.0, the presence of infection and SOFA score ≥ 2 are considered as the diagnostic criteria for sepsis, and the “rescue” measures mainly focus on reversal of organ dysfunction. However, despite nearly two decades of efforts, the “Save Sepsis Campaign” has not achieved satisfactory results. Emergency medicine is the frontier subject of acute and severe illness which treats patients with acute infections at the earliest. If at this stage, physicians can predict the possibility of sepsis progression from demographic characteristics, localize the pathogen and infection, detect the inflammatory storms by tests of cytokines and evaluate the severity of the infection with more effective clinical scoring system, and then take effective measures to prevent infection from developing into sepsis in high-risk patients, the morbidity and mortality of sepsis in patients with acute infection will be greatly reduced. Based on this situation, Chinese emergency medicine experts proposed the concept of “preventing and blocking” sepsis, and launched the nationwide “Preventing Sepsis Campaign in China (PSCC)” nationwide. The main concept is summarized as “three early and two reduces” which includes early detection, early diagnosis and early intervention during the “pre-symptomatic” and “peri-septic” stage in order to reduce the incidence of sepsis and it proposed a new approach for diagnosis and treatment of acute severe infection. This consensus is jointly advocated, discussed and written by four academic associations in the field of emergency medicine and five scholarly publishing organizations. More than 40 experts from fields of emergency medicine, critical care medicine, infectious diseases, pharmacy and laboratory medicine have participated in several rounds of deliberation and finally reached consensus on the criteria of identifying patients with acute infection, taking anti-infective treatments, screening of high-risk patients with sepsis, detection and treatment of inflammatory storm, protection of vascular endothelial cells and the regulation of coagulation function, as well as strategies of liquid support and organ function protection etc. The consensus summarizes the commonly used clinical diagnosis criteria and treatment measures of sepsis both in Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine for clinicians in order to provide evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Keywords: Sepsis; Preventing; Infection; Cytokines; Organ function


How to cite this article:
Wang Z, Yu X, Chen Y, Lv C, Zhao X. Chinese expert consensus on early prevention and intervention of sepsis. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2020;13:335-49

How to cite this URL:
Wang Z, Yu X, Chen Y, Lv C, Zhao X. Chinese expert consensus on early prevention and intervention of sepsis. Asian Pac J Trop Med [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 9];13:335-49. Available from: http://www.apjtm.org/text.asp?2020/13/8/335/289438




  1. Introduction Top


Sepsis is a collection of symptoms linked to high fatality arising from a dysregulated response to an infection which leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction[1]. Sepsis not only threatens human life, but also brings a huge economic burden on medical and health care system. A meta-analysis of studies on incidence and mortality of sepsis among the adults in 27 developed countries from 1979 to 2015 showed the incidence of sepsis was 288 per 100 000 per year, while the 10-year incidence of the disease was 437 per 100 000 per year and the mortality was 17%; the incidence of severe sepsis was 270 per 100 000 per year and the mortality was 26%[2]. Few sepsis-related studies have included data from developing and less developed countries, where the incidence and mortality of sepsis is higher as shown in other reports[3].

Studies on incidence of sepsis mainly reported data of ICU patients. In 2020, a multi-center research showed the incidence of sepsis among ICU patients in 44 hospitals across the country was 20.6%[4]. Similarly, mortality data of sepsis are mostly from ICU patients. In the above mentioned multi-center study, the mortality was 35.5%. For severe cases, the mortality was as high as 50% or above. The study also found there was no significant difference in the mortality between patients who met the diagnostic criteria of Sepsis 3.0 and Sepsis 2.0[4]. In Australia and New Zealand, the hospital mortality rate for severe sepsis was 18.4%-35%[5]; while in the United States, the mortality rate for sepsis (defined by ICD-9-CM) decreased from 27.8% in 1979 to 17.9% in 2000[6].

According to reports on sepsis, the fatality rate of sepsis in China is higher than that in developed countries. A population-based epidemiological survey of sepsis found that 1 025 997 people died of sepsis in 2015, accounting for 12.6% of the total hospital fatality cases[7]. Another single-center retrospective study of 759 severe sepsis patients from 2006 to 2016 showed that the mortality rate was as high as 36.6%[8]. Although the correct and reasonable application of antibacterial drugs are the key measures of successful treatment and one of the main factors to reduce the mortality, other active auxiliary treatments, such as fluid resuscitation, immune conditioning, nutritional support and other measures also prevent sepsis from developing to severe sepsis or septic shock[9].

Considering its high incidence and mortality[4],[10], the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis has been the study focus of emergency medicine, critical medicine, infectious diseases, as well as surgery since 2001. Experts have successively proposed versions 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 of sepsis diagnosis, and have also proposed plans such as “save sepsis action”, “Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT)”, “cluster therapy” and other concepts like “restrictive ventilation”, “optimal PEEP”, “protective lung ventilation” etc. However the incidence and mortality of sepsis have not been significantly reduced over the past two decades[10].

Based on the characteristics of emergency medicine, Chinese experts put forward Preventing Sepsis Campaign in China (PSCC) in May 2018. They advocated prevention, diagnosis, and intervention at earliest to decrease the morbidity and mortality of sepsis, and put forward the theory of pre-sepsis state as well as the principle of prevention before the onset and prevention from deterioration of sepsis. They highlighted preventing the onset and blocking the progression of sepsis as the key points, and suggested some breakthrough points including cutting off the intermediates during the development of infections into organ failure, controlling infection and inflammation, and regulating blood coagulation by endotheliocyte protective agents during peri-sepsis. Considering that patients with severe infections usually visit the emergency department firstly, it is important and feasible to start with prevention measures in the emergency department, which could help effective early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). In January 2017, WHO also proposed integrated intervention of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Moreover, all participants agreed on improving the prevention and treatment of sepsis at the regular meeting of WHO on 26 May 2017[11]. Flow chart of sepsis prevention and control in Emergency Department was shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The flowchart of sepsis prevention and control in Emergency Department.

Click here to view



  2. Diagnosis of acute infectious diseases Top


As the commonest diseases in the emergency department, infectious diseases are preconditions to sepsis. Timely diagnosis and proper treatment is the first step to prevent its early intervention. However, for physicians in the emergency department, it is very difficult to confirm the occurrence of infections due to the diversity of symptoms.

Acute infections occur in a short time (<72 h) and are caused by inflammatory changes of tissues or organs[12], which are attributed to pathogenic microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, funguses, mycoplasma or chlamydia, parasites, etc. The clinical symptoms consist of general and local symptoms.

2.1. Diagnosis based on general symptoms

2.1.1. Temperature change

Temperature change is the most important indicator for the diagnosis of infections. More than 90% of patients with infectious diseases have an acute fever. Some infirm or immunocompromised patients may not present with fever, some patients with severe infections may have hypothermia, and some patients may present with pseudo normal temperature due to antifebrile or physical cooling. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is an important intermediate during the development of sepsis and was an important diagnostic indicator. According to the diagnosis standard of SIRS, the temperature change is the top one indicator. Thus, acute infections should be taken into consideration for any patients with abnormal temperatures.

2.1.2. Leukocyte change

Leukocytes change in peripheral blood is the second characteristic change of acute infections and could help to differentiate various infections. Increased leukocyte count is one of the most specific changes of acute bacterial infections. Increased neutrophil or obvious shift to left could appear during classification detection, which is supportive of acute bacterial infections. Decreased leukocyte could occur during virus infections and some special infections.

2.2. Biochemical markers of infections

Biochemical markers are indicators useful for infection detections in recent years. They could help identify the occurrence of infections and possible pathogens. At present, the common biochemical markers include serum C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum amyloid protein A (SAA), and heparin-binding protein (HBP)[13].

2.2.1. CRP

CRP is one of acute-phase reactive proteins and could be increased rapidly by most infections. It is usually increased 2 h after infection and reaches the peak 24-48 h later. CRP level increases significantly during bacterial infections, but stays normal or increases slightly during virus infections. Therefore, it is usually used as a reference to differentiate bacterial and virus infections. However, the critical value for the diagnosis of bacterial infections is unclear. Some researchers suggest 40 mg/L, while some consider >20 mg/L as the borderline value. The half-life period of CRP is 18 hours and the level will decrease rapidly 1-2 d after controling of the infection.

2.2.2. PCT

PCT is a glycoprotein without hormonal activity and is positively associated with the severity of bacterial infections. The level of 0.1-0.25 ng/mL is considered as the indicator of little possibility of infections, 0.25-0.5 ng/mL as medium possibility, and >0.5 ng/mL as great possibility[14]. Thus 0.5 ng/mL is suggested as the critical value by the majority of experts. PCT increases rapidly 2-4 h after infection and reach a peak 12-48 h later. With high specificity, PCT is the recommended indicator in many guidelines and consensus at home and abroad. The diagnosis and treatment scheme of COVID-19 in 2020 points out that most patients show normal PCT levels, which indicates that PCT is generally not elevated during virus infections and could be used as a specific marker of bacterial infections.

2.2.3. IL-6

IL-6 is a multiple-effect cytokine induced by IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α. It is a multi-functional glycoprotein and consists of 212 amino acids. As the key mediator of inflammatory cytokines, it has core regulatory function during inflammatory reactions. The level is obviously increased during bacterial infections and is positively correlated with levels of HBP, SAA, etc. With consistency with the degree of infection, it is a common indicator to evaluate and detect the infections[15]. Moreover, IL-6 has great significance in judging the severity of sepsis. It is reported that serum IL-6 levels of sepsis patients were significantly higher than the non-sepsis patients; while the levels were also significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared with non-septic shock patients[16].

2.2.4. SAA

SAA is a sensitive acute-phase reactive protein. The stimuli such as bacteria, viruses, etc. induce the body to produce a series of cytokines, then stimulate hepatic cells to synthesize and secrete plenty of SAA, which enters into blood and is 10-1 000 times higher than normal level in 5-6 h. SAA is not influenced by gender or age and is usually used in combination with CRP to differentiate bacterial and virus infections. The simultaneously increased levels of SAA and CRP indicate possible bacterial infections; while the increased levels of SAA and normal CRP indicate virus infections. The half-life period of SAA is about 50 min. It restores quickly after the elimination of antigens. Thus, it could be used as a sensitive indicator of the control of infections and inflammations.

2.2.5. HBP

HBP is a protein molecule released from the neutrophils activated by organism. Studies have shown that sepsis patients’ HBP significantly increased when the IL-6 level was normal or slightly elevated, and HBP shows higher accuracy on diagnosing of sepsis than other cytokines[17],[18], and it is especially valuable in the early and rapid diagnosis of severe bacterial infections. As an acute phase protein, HBP is an effective biomarker for evaluating disease severity in patients with sepsis, which plays more significant roles in the early diagnosis and monitoring curative effect of patients with septic shock.

2.3. Confirming infection by local symptoms and signs

Some patients, especially the elderly or those with compromised immune systems, may lack a systemic response to infection. For such patients, the characteristic signs of infection site and symptoms can help us confirm or suspect the possibility of infection, such as clear cough, cough with phlegm indicates respiratory tract infection, acute consciousness changes or headache indicates central nervous system infection, urinary frequency, urgent urination, painful urination and lumbago indicate urinary system infection, abdominal pain or diarrhea with purulent bloody stool indicates abdominal cavity or the digestive tract infections, etc.

2.4. The confirmation of acute and suspected infections

Based on the above research results and clinical experience, the presence of acute infection can be considered if the following symptoms occur: (1) acute fever (within 72 h) or hypothermia; (2)total white blood cells count increases or decreases; (3) CRP and IL-6 increase; (4) PCT, SAA and HBP increase; (5) there is a confirmed or suspected site of infection.

Confirmed infection: any two items in (1-3) + (4) with definite results, could help determine the types of pathogen, or + (5) with definite symptoms could help determine the site of infection.

Suspected infection: any one item in (1-3) + (4) without definite result, or + (5) with suspected site of infection.


  3. Screening of high-risk population of sepsis Top


3.1. Sepsis susceptible population

More and more studies indicate that sepsis is associated with specific genes in the body. In recent years, studies have confirmed that there are significant differences in the expression of sepsis biomarker genes in patients with acute infection, sepsis and septic shock and put forward a useful indicator for the screening of sepsis[19]. As a biomarker of sepsis, the sensitivity and specificity of gene detection were higher than that of PCT, which indicates that the occurrence of sepsis is related to the body constitution and also reveals that we may be able to develop a rapid detection method for sepsis biomarker gene in infected patients in the future.

In addition, age, underlying diseases, malnutrition, immunodeficiency and some other factors are also considered to be significant for occurring sepsis. In 2007, a multicenter study results showed that the risk factors for the incidence of severe sepsis and in-hospital mortality include age, malignant tumor and other chronic complications[20]. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II score), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), respiratory dysfunction and cardiovascular dysfunction score are crucial factors as well in assessing sepsis and its mortality[21]. The results of another multicenter prospective observational cohort study in 2014 showed APACHE II and SOFA scores, bloodstream infection and cancer history were significantly associated with mortality[22]. In 2016, an analysis of one-year mortality in sepsis patients showed that age, acute renal failure, fungal infection, anion gap and pulmonary infection were the predictors of one-year mortality[23].

3.2. Potential pathogenic types and common infection sites of sepsis

According to the study on the infectious pathogens causing sepsis, the proportions of various infectious pathogens in sepsis are different[24],[25], with bacteria still accounting for the largest proportion, followed by viruses. Domestic epidemiological studies suggest that more than half of patients with sepsis are infected with G-bacteria[23]. Zhou et al.[22] present that the infection rate of gram-negative (G -) bacteria can reach 62.5%, while gram-positive (G +) bacteria only account for 14.5%. However, more studies believe that the most common pathogenic bacteria causing sepsis are G + bacteria[26],[21].The incidence of fungal sepsis has increased in the past 10 years, but it is still lower than that of bacterial sepsis[25],[28]. This difference may be due to the lack of large-scale epidemiological studies, and etiology in different regions and ICU differs as well. It may also be related to the changes in the etiology types caused by the usage of antimicrobial drug[29].Various viral infections are also important causes of sepsis. Both globally prevalent COVID-19 in 2020 and SARS-CoV-2 lead to multiple organs disfunction syndrome (MODS) through generating cytokines and interfering with RAS system[30].

The research on the site of infection causing sepsis is also one of the research focus. A multicenter study in 2007 showed that the abdomen was the most common site of infection for sepsis (72.3%), followed by the lungs (52.8%)[20].The results of a multicentre prospective study in 2014 showed that pulmonary infection was the most common cause of sepsis, accounting for more than 50% of all sepsis patients, followed by abdominal infection and urinary tract infection[22]. A study found that the fatality rate of sepsis caused by unknown infection site, gastrointestinal tract or lung infection was between 50% and 55%, compared with only 30% for sepsis caused by urinary tract infection[31]. Similar results were reported in a retrospective multicenter cohort study of nearly 8 000 patients with septic shock, with the highest case fatality rate (78%) in patients with sepsis due to intestinal ischemia and the lowest case fatality rate (26%) in patients with sepsis due to urinary tract obstruction[32].

In summary, the risk factors for sepsis in patients with acute infection include: (1) advanced age and malnutrition; (2) abdominal, pulmonary and urinary tract infections; (3) malignant tumor, immunosuppression, respiratory dysfunction, cardiovascular dysfunction and other basic diseases. High attention should be paid to this high-risk group in emergency department through the observation of clinical manifestations, screening of biomarkers and early prevention.


  4. Diagnosis and clinical suspicion of sepsis Top


4.1. Diagnosis of sepsis and Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

Sepsis 3.0 defined that patients with infection and total SOFA score ≥ 2 points can be diagnosed with sepsis. Sepsis 3.0 included the definition and clinical diagnostic criteria of sepsis.

The SOFA score is a scoring system for the prognosis of patients through evaluation of degree of major organ damages, and is usually used in ICU[33]. It is suggested that the SOFA score is applied 24 h after admission to ICU and every 48 h afterwards. Therefore, it is named as “Sequential Organ Failure Assessment”. This score is more suitable to be used for inpatients because of its requirement of various clinical data and sequential assessment, but has certain limitation to early and rapid diagnosis in the emergency department. The mean value and maximum value of the SOFA score can predict the mortality of sepsis patients. If the score is increased by 30%, the mortality will reach at least 50%[34]. However, the SOFA score is of little significance for predicting the incidence of sepsis. Below is the calculation method of the SOFA score [Table 1][33],[35].
Table 1: Calculation method of the SOFA score.

Click here to view


4.2. Suspected sepsis in emergency department

According to the diagnostic criteria of Sepsis 3.0, organ dysfunction is considered as an important indicator of sepsis. However, manifestations such as insufficient effective circulating blood volume and severe inflammation may appear in infected patients in the emergency department before the occurrence of organ dysfunction. Such manifestations can be diagnosed as “Pre-sepsis stage” or “Suspected sepsis”, which is of great importance to PSCC. Emergency phsicians usually make empirical diagnosis based on clinical data, and screen patients who may develop sepsis according to the disease score.

4.2.1. The quickSOFA (qSOFA) score

The qSOFA score is a useful screening tool for the suspected sepsis recommended by Sepsis 3.0 [Table 2][1]. The analysis shows that, the higher the qSOFA score, the higher the risk of death, but the prediction validity varies significantly among the cases. In a study of patients with suspected infection, the predictive validity of qSOFA for in-hospital mortality is similar to the SOFA score: in total score < 2, the mortality is 3%; in total score ≥ 2, the mortality reaches 24% and 18%, respectively[36]. However, some studies have questioned the sensitivity and specificity of the qSOFA score. In 2018, a meta analysis that included 38 studies revealed that, the qSOFA had a lower sensitivity (88% vs. 61%) but higher specificity (26% vs. 72%) for predicting the mortality in patients with sepsis in comparison with the SIRS score[37]. Compared with non-ICU patients, the qSOFA had a higher sensitivity for ICU patients (51% vs. 87%) with a lower specificity (80% vs. 33%). Other retrospective studies on emergency patients found that the qSOFA score had certain limitation, one of which reported that the qSOFA was less useful than the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score in identifying sepsis[38]. In addition, another report demonstrated its low value for predicting 28-day mortality[39].
Table 2: The qSOFA score.

Click here to view


4.2.2. National Early Warning Score (NEWS)

The early scoring systems such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), NEWS and SIRS score are more effective than qSOFA in terms of the prediction of death of non-ICU patients and ICU transfer[40],[41].

In clinical work of the emergency department, the most important indicators reflecting changes in the condition are not changes in breathing, consciousness, and blood pressure, but changes in heart rate (pulse). The Early Warning Score (EWS), MEWS and NEWS[42] developed by UK experts [Table 3] are a useful tool for rapid evaluation and grading of the severity of the disease which are recognized in the field of emergency medicine. The evaluation indexes supplemented with correction of oxygen inhalation measures, which are available in the emergency department of and the hospital, make the judgment of the condition more accurate, especially for patients with changes in cardiopulmonary function. The advantages of early warning scoring in assessment of the condition of emergency patients are fully confirmed in a previous study where the effectiveness of the improved early warning scoring system for the prognosis of elderly shock patients was evaluated[43]. Hence, the NEWS is more comprehensive than the qSOFA in evaluating the critical condition of patients.
Table 3: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS).

Click here to view


4.2.3. Diagnostic criteria for suspected sepsis in Emergency Department

Patient’s clinical manifestations include: (1) Patients with infection or suspected with infection; (2) qSOFA ≥ 2 points; (3) SOFA = 1 point; (4) NEWS: 4-6 points.

In addition to the first manifestation, patients who have any other manifestations can be diagnosed as “suspected sepsis”.


  5. Prevention of sepsis Top


5.1. Identification of patients at high risk for sepsis

Population at high risk for sepsis, namely being susceptible to sepsis, include those with specific genes, having infected sites with high incidence of sepsis or with pathogen infection. For the elderly, malnutrition or patients with basic diseases or immunocompromise, the infected site and possible pathogens should be identified as soon as possible. Patients with severe pulmonary abdominal and urinary system infections should be screened for cytokines in a timely manner. Any infected patients should be promptly evaluated for suspected sepsis. Those with SOFA = 1 point, qSOFA ≥ 2 points or NEWS of 4-6 points should receive timely treatment for preventing sepsis and the score should be done every two hours for their condition.

5.2. Infection control

5.2.1. Detection of pathogenic microorganism

The pathogens that cause acute infection are bacteria, viruses, fungi, mycoplasma or chlamydia, parasites, etc. However, pathogens leading to sepsis are mainly bacteria, viruses and fungi. Hence, identifying pathogens as soon as possible and adopting targeted antimicrobial therapy are the key to treat infectious diseases. Since traditional microbial culture is time-consuming and has a narrow coverage, a rapid detection system of etiology is quite needed for the acute infection. For common pathogens such as bacteria and viruses, the existing rapid detection methods are: detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen in urine, detection of Legionella pneumonophila antigen in urine, detection of GXpert Clostridium difficile, and multiple pathogen detection platforms such as FilmArray/Roche Cobas/Luminex; Fungal fluorescence staining, detection of Pneumocystis yersinensis by Gomori’s methenamine silver staining, detection of Cryptococcus neoformans antigen, G test, GM test, aspergillus IgG, IgE and other fungal detection methods; Detection of antigen and nucleic acid, Realtime-PCR detection of various viruses, and other virus detection methods. Currently, the second-generation sequencing technology has been increasingly mature and applied in clinic. It covers thousands of pathogens so as to avoid missing detection to the greatest extent and has become a powerful method for etiological diagnosis[44].

5.2.2. Anti-infection treatment

Viruses, bacteria, fungi, etc. are likely to cause sepsis, and sepsis caused by bacteria and viruses is still more common in clinic. Actually, at present there is no specific effective treatment for viral infection, which is usually controlled by immune regulation or traditional Chinese medicine. In bacterial infections, infection control is not only an important measure to prevent sepsis, but also a crucial method to prevent death from infection. Therefore, when selecting antibiotics for treatment, priority should be given to the antibiotics that cover suspected pathogens and have higher concentrations at the possible infection site. In addition, patient’s age, immune status, anaphylactic reaction, etc. should be also taken into consideration. During anti-infection treatment in the emergency department, we need to consider pathogen coverage and infection control, and try to avoid the drug-resistant bacteria caused by the overuse of antibiotics. Therefore, antibiotic selection should be based on rapid pathogen detection, infection site and high incidence of pathogenic bacteria. The recommendations for clinical anti-infection treatment are given in The Sanford guideline to antimicrobial therapy 2018][45] [Table 4]. Furthermore, anti-infection treatment should be timely; anti-infection treatment should be started within 1 h after diagnosis for severe infection, and antibiotics should be used within 4 h after diagnosis for mild infection, and also it is recommended to collect pathogenic specimens before the use of antibiotics.
Table 4: Common infections and antibiotic selection[34].

Click here to view


5.2.3. Removal of the focus of infection

It is difficult for antibiotic therapy alone to effectively treat traumatic infection, pyogenic cholecystitis, abdominal with a definite infectious site infection, urinary obstruction complicated with infection, etc. So, antibiotic therapy must be used in combined with localized treatment of infection sites including drainage, debridement and surgical resection. In addition, taking timely intervention is a crucial step to prevent sepsis.

5.3. Detection and blocking of cytokine storms

The local inflammatory response caused by infection can promote the replacement of damaged tissue with new tissue and weaken the damage that has occurred. However, when excessive inflammatory response occurs, it may cause SIRS and lead to sepsis. Therefore, timely detection of cytokine storms and appropriate regulation of inflammatory response are of great significance for preventing sepsis and are the core of the prevention of sepsis.

5.3.1. Cytokine screening and SIRS determination

Cytokine screening should be performed in high-risk patients with sepsis and patients with suspected systemic inflammation, to determine the status of SIRS. At present, it is not clear what factors trigger and promote cytokine storms. But, it is known that many cytokines are involved in the response to sepsis. Numerous studies suggest the factors mainly involved in SIRS and compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome are: TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, MIF, sCD74 and HMGB-1[46],[47], and anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL -4, IL-10, IL-35, IL-37, TGF-β, IL-13, etc[48]. Evidence suggests that inflammatory regulation should be initiated when proinflammatory factors are significantly elevated or when an inflammatory response is out of balance. Therefore, for those at a high risk of infection of sepsis, regular cytokine monitoring (repeat every 2-4 h) should be conducted to detect and find the patients with suspected sepsis as early as possible. The expert team has organized the research and development of detection method for sepsis screening, which will be applied in the clinical practice of PSCC. At present, the cytokine commonly detected in hospitals is IL-6. As a cytokine of interleukin, IL-6 mainly stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of cells involved in the immune response and plays an important role in the body’s anti-infection immune response. When the inflammatory response occurs, the serum concentration of IL-6 increases earlier than other biomarkers. Also, PCT and CRP are induced after an increase of IL-6 concentration.

5.3.2. Inflammation regulation

When the level of cytokine is significantly increased, or the inflammation disorders are detected in the infected patients, the inflammation should be regulated as soon as possible to restore the inflammatory response in a stable and balanced state.

5.3.2.1. Glucocorticoids

Most studies recommend that glucocorticoids can be used in the treatment of septic shock[49],[50], while there is no evidence that glucocorticoids can reduce the mortality of patient with sepsis who did not show sustained shock and has a low risk of death. However, there are studies suggesting that glucocorticoids can be given at a certain dose in the early stage to inhibit the secretion and release of inflammatory cytokines. Clinical trials have evidenced that glucocorticoids can regulate the immunity of patients with sepsis, restore their inflammatory response and prevent organ failure[51], which was included in the Guidelines for emergency treatment of sepsis/septic shock in China (2018)[52]. What is important now is the timing to use the hormone when SIRS-related detection methods are unavailable.

5.3.2.2. Nonhormonal anti-inflammatory drugs

The literature has shown that ulinastatin serves in regulating cytokines[53]. Ulinastatin is a glycoprotein that can inhibit the activity of various proteolytic enzymes and it is also a protease inhibitor that can inhibit trypsin and other enzymes. It has a stable lysosomal membrane, which is able to inhibit the release of lysosomal enzymes, to suppress the myocardial inhibitory factor (MDF), to scavenge oxygen free radicals and to inhibit the release of cytokine. In the early stage of cytokine elevation, the use of low-dose ulinastatin can regulate cytokines. When the cytokine is out of control, pro-inflammatory cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines would be out of balance, causing organ dysfunction. The use of high-dose ulinastatin can significantly decrease the patients’ sepsis-related indicators.

5.3.2.3. Chinese medicinal formulations

The traditional Chinese medicine advocates a harmonious balance state of the body in order to treat both symptoms and internal causes of the disease. At present, many studies have proved that certain traditional Chinese medicinal substance or formula can prevent sepsis and improve the prognosis of sepsis patients by regulating inflammation and immune response, inhibiting platelet aggregation, and improving microcirculation. The Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7) released by the China’s National Health Commission, has included the traditional Chinese medicine treatment as one of the important treatment methods, and recommended the use of Chinese herbal medicines and Chinese patent medicines according to degrees of severity. Specific prescriptions of Chinese patent medicines that have relatively clear efficacy, such as Reduning, Xuebijing and Shenfu injections, were recommended in the treatment of severe and critical cases. Although the active ingredients and mechanism of action of many Chinese patent medicines have not been defined, the overall efficacy of Chinese medicine has been clinically proven. Reduning injection has a certain effect on viruses inhibiting and anti-bacteria in the treatment of sepsis. By binding antagonism endotoxin and toll-like receptors, it can inhibit the NF-κB receptor and MAPK signaling pathway and regulate the expression of cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF , IL-10, IL-13, ICAM-1, ET-1, etc, further affecting the biological function of regulatory T cells and improving the permeability of capillaries and pulmonary vessels[4]. It can also reduce neutrophil and lymphocyte exudation and antagonize the inflammatory response and regulate immune disorders[54-56]. Such drugs neither affect the anti-bacteria effect of antibiotics, nor lead to the spread of infection. Clinical practice has shown that Reduning injection with an appropriate dose at an appropriate time can shorten the treatment time of the disease and the relief time for symptoms, and reduce the probability of organ failure when the disease is getting worse, thus effectively prevent the occurrence of sepsis and disease progression[57]. Xuebijing injection has the effects of invigorating blood circulation for removing blood stasis, relieving meridian, and expelling toxin through inhibiting pro- inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-17, inhibiting expression of high-mobility group B1 (HMGB1) protein in late inflammatory cytokines, inhibiting the activation of the TLR4- NF-κB pathway[58],[60],[61],[62],[63], thus achieving an anti-inflammatory result. There is evidence that combined with Western medicine treatment, Xuebijing injection can reduce the occurrence of sepsis, improve the patients’ condition and clinical outcomes[64]. A randomized controlled clinical study of patients with pneumonia complicated with sepsis showed that Xuebijing injection reduced the case fatality rate by 8.8% in 28 d, the pneumonia was severe PSI risk rating improvement by 14.4%, the length of mechanical ventilation was reduced by 5.5 d and the length in the ICU was reduced by 4 d. The study. The results was published in the international Critical Care Medicine journal (CCM)[65].

5.3.2.4. Inflammatory mediator and specific antibodies

At present, many researches have been devoted to investigating TNF-α, IL-1 antibodies and anti-endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antibodies; these antibodies can relieve symptoms of sepsis by inducing proinflammatory cytokine inactivation[66]. In addition, studies have found that pentoxifylline can inhibit the activation of monocytes-macrophages and neutrophils, thereby inhibiting the secretion of IL-1 and TNF-α[67]. However, the clinical effect of these methods and the new antagonist drugs still need to be further studied before they can be applied in the clinic.

5.3.3. Regulation of the immunity system

Recent studies reported that inflammatory response always combined with immunosuppression in the sepsis, rather than that a pro-inflammatory response followed by an anti-inflammatory response as previously described[68]. Many studies have shown that the innate immunity and adaptive immunity are suppressed during sepsis, which can be found from the decrease of mature granulocytes and mature ratio, the “endotoxin tolerance” of mononuclear-macrophages, and reduction of dendritic cells and lymphocyte, etc[69]. Therefore, timely regulation of the immunity system is one of the important methods to prevent sepsis. Current preventive methods including regulating the innate immune response through granulocyte-macrophage colony factor and interferon γ, and regulating the adaptive immune function by using thymosin 1 and interleukin 7, etc[70]. However, the timing, dosage, and specific drugs of the immunomodulator are not yet clear. Whether it is for the prevention of sepsis or the clinical effect of the treatment of sepsis needs further study.

5.4. Vascular protection and regulation of coagulation

Vascular endothelial injury and microthrombosis lead to decreased perfusion of tissue cells, causing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which are considered to be the direct causes of organ dysfunction. The mechanisms that cause DIC include upregulation of procoagulant substances, downregulation of anticoagulant substances, and impaired fibrinolysis mechanism. Therefore, timely monitoring of coagulation related indicators is essential to prevent the occurrence of sepsis, especially platelet count. In addition, plasma D-dimer (D-dimer) is also a commonly used clinical reference index for coagulation function, reflecting the activation state of coagulation function[71].

The clinical manifestations varies in different stages of DIC, including bleeding, organ dysfunction, shock, and microvascular disease hemolysis [Table 5]. In the PSCC Campaign, the expert panel believes that We should focus on hypercoagulation in the early stage and give timely treatment.
Table 5: Stages of disseminated intravascular coagulation and their manifestations.

Click here to view


5.4.1. Anticoagulant therapy

The inflammation with sepsis destroys the coagulation system, depletes endogenous anticoagulant factors, and inhibits fibrinolytic activity, which causes thrombosis, finally resulting in tissue hypoxia and organ damage. While inflammatory factors and inflammatory cells destroy the physiological anticoagulation mechanism, they also increase the release of tissue factors, which activates exogenous coagulation factors and worsens the inflammatory response. The entire process has been circulating, leading to the continued consumption and the final failure of anticoagulant substances, which eventually leads to abnormalities in the coagulation mechanism, which can seriously develop into multiple organ failure and cause death. Taking appropriate anticoagulant treatment for infected patients is one of the measures to prevent microthrombosis and sepsis. The drugs used clinically are mainly unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin.

5.4.1.1. Unfractionated heparin

As effective anticoagulant drug, the application and dosage of Unfractionated heparin vary according to the clinical type and stage of DIC. Timely heparin treatment can improve the perfusion of surrounding tissues and has a tendency to reduce the case fatality rate, but it may also increase the risk of severe bleeding, therefore it is not recommended in a routine medication for sepsis complicated by DIC. What is matter is that how to detect the early hypercoagulable state. Only when patients in the hypercoagulable period have increased thrombin and thrombosis in their microcirculation, heparin anticoagulation therapy can achieve satisfactory results.

5.4.1.2. Low molecular weight heparin

As an anticoagulant drug depolymerized from ordinary heparin, Low molecular weight heparin can quickly exert antithrombotic effects after administration, and studies have shown that it can also significantly improves hemodynamics[72], with high bioavailability and low bleeding risk as well as the characteristics of immune activity and longer half-life period. In addition, the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of infected patients with sepsis may inhibit abnormal coagulation function, reduce the abnormal loss of platelets, prevent oxygen free radical damage, and have a significant effect on the improvement of microcirculation. While inhibiting the activation of the pathological coagulation system, low molecular weight heparin can also effectively reduce the occurrence of severe bleeding[73].

5.4.2. Alternative treatment

Alternative treatment depends on whether there is bleeding or a very high risk of bleeding due to a reduction in certain blood components.

If the patient has the following conditions, an alternative treatment using blood products can be considered.

5.4.2.1. Blood platelet

For active bleeding, PLT needs to reach 50 × 109 /L or more. Other indications for platelet importation include:

  1. PLT < 10 × 109/L without obvious signs of bleeding
  2. PLT < 20 × 109/L with high risk of bleeding


5.4.2.2. Coagulation factors

  1. When there is no bleeding or invasive operation plan, it is not recommended to use fresh frozen plasma to correct coagulation abnormalities.
  2. With prothrombin time (PT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) prolonged longer than 1.5 times, or fibrinogen (FIB) less than 1.5 g/L, fresh frozen plasma of 15-30 mL/kg can be intravenously injected.
  3. Clotting factor concentrates can be used when the bleeding of DIC patients is caused by fluid overload. The plasma FIB of patients with DIC should be maintained at least 1.0-1.5 g/L.


5.5. Circulation capacity support

One of the important means of “curing sepsis” is fluid resuscitation. The premise of “resuscitation” is a clear decrease in effective circulating blood volume or shock. PSCC aims to prevent and stop the occurrence of sepsis early, so the focus of this consensus is before shock. Early endothelial cell damage and capillary leakage can cause invisible capacity shortage by when we need to identify and give liquid supplement support as soon as possible and the sooner the support time is, the better the effect will be, as the effective supplementation of liquid can not only ensure tissue perfusion, but also prevent blood hypercoagulability and microthrombosis. Early goal-directed (EGDT) fluid support should be started in the early stage of sepsis, and the qSOFA and NEWS scores should be reduced as soon as possible.

Although the ProCESS study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2014 and the ARESE study’s clinical application of traditional EGDT methods yielded negative results, it is believed that whether EGDT showed no advantages over a 60-day in-hospital mortality or secondary endpoints including long-term mortality and organ support[74-76]. The expert group believes that this loss of EGDT advantage is not a conceptual error, but because of the patient’s choice, timing, and goal setting. In the emergency department, patients can receive treatment much earlier than the ICU. Therefore, the opinions of experts believe that early positive liquid support is still one of the important treatment strategies for the emergency department to prevent sepsis.

Most studies believe that when choosing the type of fluid replacement, theoretically, the primary selection would be the crystal fluid, especially the crystal fluid that is similar to the factors that affect the internal environment such as the ionic composition, acidity, and charge of the extracellular fluid. Some experts believe that due to the small molecular weight of the crystal solution, it is easy to leak through the capillaries to the interstitial space, so it is not the first choice[77],[78]. The clinical standard of the amount of fluid replacement is based on maintaining the stability of the whole circulation (heart rate, average arterial pressure and central venous pressure in the normal range) and normal lactate in arterial blood.

5.6. Protection of organ function

5.6.1. Increasing prevention awareness

It is a continuous process from infection to sepsis, and then from early stage of sepsis to organ dysfunction, eventually to multiple organ failure[19]. Emergency physicians need to accurately understand the MODS process caused by sepsis, investigate high-risk patients as early as possible, determine the degree of infection, detect and control inflammatory storms, provide respiratory and circulatory support, and protect the organ function as early as possible. For patients with signs of MODS, measures should be taken as soon as possible to avoid further aggravation of organ dysfunction and to avoid more organs damaged.

5.6.2. Improving the comprehensive awareness

Various organs of body interacted under a normal physiological status and its unction in a stable state. On one hand, when there is incomplete organ function, the balance of the body will be broken. If this imbalance failed to be timely adjusted, the damage to the organs will be further exacerbated, bringing the gradual failure of other organs. On the other hand, any intervention during the treatment may break the original balance and cause a series of subsequent organ damage. Therefore, in the process of diagnosis and treatment of patients, the “holistic health” and “prevention of disease progression should be emphasized, which should not only support injured organs, but also protect the normal organs and maintain the balance of organ functions. In the treatment, while supporting the organs, it should take into account the primary disease, inflammatory response and other aspects of treatment, and strive to make the body reach a new steady state as soon as possible.

5.6.3. Dynamic evaluation

Comprehensive and dynamic diagnosis of the functions of organs plays a vital role in early detection of organ impairments and he therapeutic effects of MODS. We should pay more attention to the changes in clinical parameters, for example, patients’ vital signs, urine volume, peripheral circulation, and skin mucous membrane, etc. Besides, other non-invasive or invasive surveillance methods are required. Respiratory and circulatory monitoring is a primary part of the diagnosis and treatment of emergency service, and surveillance of infection and inflammation factors of the suspected-sepsis patients should be attached same importance. In clinical, dynamic surveillance of NEWS scores, SOFA scores, and MODS severity scores can offer various monitoring indexes and views to prevent SIRS and MODS, and consequently prevent sepsis.

5.6.4. Early intervention

The core of early intervention of sepsis, is to reduce the negative effects of excessive response on the organs. Considering that, we should take full advantage of traditional Chinese medicine. From aspect of traditional Chinese medicine, sepsis has other names, for instance, externally contracted heat disease, collapse syndrome, blood syndrome, sudden dyspnea, “Shenhun” (unconsciousness), organ-exhaustion syndrome, etc. The pathogenesis of sepsis reflects the deficiency of “Zhengqi” (anti-pathogenic energy), following by “Waixie” (exogenous pathogens) turning into heat after the invasion of the body, and then consuming “qi” and injuring “yin” (loss of energy). The energy is restrained, and the exogenous pathogens are deep inside the body, so that the circulation of blood and “qi” is blocked, resulting in heat toxin, blood stasis, sputum-induced stagnation of collateral channels, consequently the injury of organs. The concept of early intervention coincides with the theory of “treatment before disease attack” proposed in The Inner Canon of Huangdi. As for the treatment of the disease, four treatments are applied to four different syndromes, heat-clearing and detoxicating remedy for the treatment of virus-induced heat; “Tongli Gongxia” herbs for blockage of “Fuqi”; Activating blood for blood stasis syndromes; supporting and consolidating body resistance for acute deficiency syndrome.

5.6.4.1. Selecting treatments for different syndromes

  1. Heat toxin syndrome: The symptoms include prolonged high fever, restlessness, unconsciousness, nausea and vomiting, crimson tongue, rapid pulse, etc. The frequently-used traditional Chinese medicines include Retoxonin injection, Qingkailing injection, Xingnaojing injection, Angong Niuhuang Wan, etc[80].
  2. Blockage of “Fuqi”: Similar to the symptoms of intestinal obstruction in Western medicine, symptoms of “Fuqi” include ventosity, vomiting, rare defecation or fart, decline or disappear of bowel sound, etc. One of the initial factors of sepsis, according to some studies, is the transmission of bacteria stemmed from bowel dysfunction[81],[82]. Early recovery of bowel function is of great importance for the prevention of sepsis. As one of the prescriptions, Dachengqi decoction can markedly decrease the mortality of MODS patients, reduce inflammatory mediators, inhibit the inflammatory response, regulate immune function, and has antibacterial properties[83].
  3. Blood stasis: The symptoms include high fever, unconsciousness, extreme pain without fixed location which generally aggravates at night, tumor, bleeding, dark purple tongue with ecchymosis, deep and late pulse signs, etc. Herbs including Honghua, Chishao, Chuanxiong, Dangui, Danshen and Xuefu Zhuyu decoction are commonly used traditional Chinese medicines for the treatment of the sepsis categorized as blood stasis. As for the Chinese patent medicine, compound Danshen injection and Xubijing injection are the representatives[84],[85].
  4. Acute deficiency syndromes: The symptoms, similar to that of shock in Western medicine, include unconsciousness and restlessness, flushed face, enophthalmos, skin folds, fever and anxiety, thirst, less urine, red and dry tongue, thready and rapid pulses, etc. In clinical, Shengmai injection[86] or Shenmai injection is commonly used to strengthen “qi”, nourish “yin”. As one of the deficiency syndromes, “Yangtuo” syndrome is presented as cold sweet, cold limbs, confusion, red face and purple lips, uncontrolled urine and sluggish hands, pale purple tongue, weak pulse signs. For the treatment, Shenfu injection is commonly used in clinic to supply “Qi” and strengthen “Yang”. “Yin-yang Jutuo” syndrome, severe deficiency syndromes with signs of acute disease presenting with hidrosis, mental exhaustion, breathlessness, uroclepsia, less saliva, week pulse sign or powerless pulse sign, etc. Shengmai injection, Shenmai injection, and Shenfu injection can be used in combination for the treatment.


5.6.4.2. Single herb for the treatment

  1. Rheum officinale. Rhubarb can promote gastrointestinal motility, protect intestinal mucosa, stimulate the expulsion of endotoxin, reduce bacterial and toxin translocation, and have anti-inflammatory and bacteriostatic effects. It has a significant preventive and therapeutic effect on MODS, and can improve the survival rate of MODS involving more than 4 organs[87],[88].
  2. Salvia miltiorrhiza. The water-soluble components of Salvia miltiorrhiza have good antithrombotic and circulatory effects, so as to reduce the damage of organ function. In-vitro experiments showed that Salvia miltiorrhiza had antagonistic effects on lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and its protective effect on lung might be through inhibiting or reducing the expression of TNF-α and other cytokines in blood and lung tissues to decline the acute inflammatory response in the lungs[89].
  3. Panax ginseng. Experimental studies have confirmed[90] that the various active ingredients of ginseng have little effect on the direct destruction of endotoxin structure, but it has a strong antagonistic and protective effect on fever, leukocyte sudden decline, shock and death caused by endotoxin.



  6. Conclusion Top


Initiated with infection, sepsis causes organ dysfunction sequentially through cytokine storm, capillary endothelial injury, capillary leakage, microthrombus formation and tissue perfusion decline. The medical staff has reaped abundant experience in organ function protection and replacement over many years practice, but the treatment efficacy is still unsatisfactory. There is limited we can do the block the progression from infection to sepsis. The reasons lie in the complicated pathophysiology and the limited knowledge on the prevention methods of sepsis. As a clinical specialty with earliest contact with patients, emergency medicine has the features and advantages of early diagnosis, risk classification, reasonable transfer, and proper treatment. Through the early intervention on the pathophysiological progression, we can prevent sepsis and reduce the incidence. Besides, proper diagnosis and treatment can decline the mortality of sepsis. But we have proposed this treatment concept without a long time, so we are still confronted with many difficulties raised by MODS, for instance, the complexity of infectious disease, the complexity of susceptible populations, the complexity of cytokine storms in initiation and development, etc. Considering that, joint efforts should be made by the medical staff and researchers to prevent sepsis. With a good start, we believe the steadfast development of PSCC will obtain satisfactory achievements, and benefit the medical sector, society and our people.

Appendix: List of consensus members

Yu Cao, Yanfen Chai, Yangong Chao, Biao Chen, Fang Chen, Feng Chen, Yuguo Chen, Wei Cui, Shimin Dong, Bangjiang Fang, Xiaotong Han, Xiaojun He, Yinping Li, Zhaofen Lin, Xiaoran Liu, Zhongqiu Lu, Chuanzhu Lv, Yuefeng Ma, Yuhong Mi, Shinan Nie, Qiao Pei, Chuanyun Qian, Lijie Qin, Deya Shang, Junli Si, Chaoyang Tong, Lijun Wang, Zhenjie Wang, Zhong Wang, Jie Wei, Feng Xu, Tie Xu, Yongming Yao, Xuezhong Yu, Hongke Zeng, Guoqiang Zhang, Hong Zhang, Jinsong Zhang, Xinchao Zhang, Mao Zhang, Min Zhao, Xiaodong Zhao, Zhigang Zhao, Bo Zheng, Huadong Zhu, Yimin Zhu.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-023).

Authors’ contributions

ZW, JW, HDZ, YC and the corresponding authors organized and drafted the consensus. Other members made comments and suggestions on the final version of this consensus.



 
  References Top

1.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315(8): 801-810.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NKJ, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193(3): 259-272.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet 2010; 376: 1339-1346.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Xie JF, Wang HL, Kang Y, Zhou LX, Liu ZM, Qin BY, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A national cross-sectional survey. Crit Care Med 2020; 48(3): e209-e218.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014; 311(13): 1308.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. New Engl J Med 2003; 348(16): 1546-1554.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Weng L, Zeng XY, Yin P, Wang LJ, Wang CY, Jiang W, et al. Sepsis-related mortality in China: A descriptive analysis. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44(7):1071-1080.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Liang JF, Li ZY, Dong HS, Zhang W, Xu C, Gao ML. Multivariate analysis of prognosis of sepsis patients in ICU. Chin J Crit Care Med 2018; 38(1): 46-52.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sun SY, Liu YH. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. Med Recapitulate 2013; 19(3): 499-501.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Grande E, Grippo F, Frova L, Pantosti A, Pezzotti P, Fedeli U. The increase of sepsis-related mortality in Italy: A nationwide study, 2003-2015. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38(9): 1701-1708.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado FR, Schachter RD, Finfer S. Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority-A WHO resolution. New Engl J Med 2017; 377(5): 414-417.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Shen H, Liu ZM. Emergency and disaster medicine. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Infectious Diseases Society of China. Expert consensus on clinical significance interpretation of infection-related biomarkers. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis 2017; 40(4): 243-257.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Expert consensus group on primary emergency clinical application of procalcitonin. Expert consensus on emergency clinical application of procalcitonin (PCT). Chin J Emerg Med 2012; 21(9): 944-951.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Xu DM, Ji X, Zhou XF, Li B, Zheng Y, Zhao ZG. Diagnostic value of IL-6, serum amyloid A, sialic acid and HBP in patients with fever. Chin J Health Lab Technol 2019; 29(24): 3027-3029.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wu ZH, Zheng J, Huang W, Chang Z, Zheng Y. Effect of serum IL-6 on evaluation of illness condition of patients with infection-related sepsis. Chin JNosocomiol 2019; 29(17): 2580-2583.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Johansson J, Brattström O, Sjöberg F, Lindbom L, Herwald H, Weitzberg E, et al. Heparin-binding protein (HBP): An early marker of respiratory failure after trauma? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57(5): 580-586.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Zou YH, Yang LB, Qiu SY, Ma LD, He XQ, Wang J. Application of heparin binding protein in diagnosis and classification of sepsis. Shenzhen J Integr Tradit Chin West Med 2018; 28(20): 58-59.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lu H, Wen D, Wang X, Gan L, Du J, Sun J, et al. Host genetic variants in sepsis risk: A field synopsis and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2019; 23(1): 26.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Cheng B, Xie G, Yao S, Wu X, Guo Q, Gu M, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in critically ill surgical patients in ten university hospitals in China. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 2538-2546.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Du B, An Y, Kang Y, Yu X, Zhao M, Ma X, et al. Characteristics of critically ill patients in ICUs in Mainland China. Crit Care Med 2013; 41(1): 84-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Zhou J, Qian C, Zhao M, Yu X, Kang Y, Ma X, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units in Mainland China. PloS One 2014; 9(9): e107181.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
He XL, Liao XL, Xie ZC, Han L, Yang XL, Kang Y. Pulmonary infection is an independent risk factor for long-term mortality and quality of life for sepsis patients. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 4213712.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon JM. Septic shock. Lancet 2005; 365(9453): 63-78.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Walkey AJ, Wiener RS, Lindenauer PK. Utilization patterns and outcomes associated with central venous catheter in septic shock: A population-based study. Crit Care Med 2013; 41(6): 1450-1457.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(2): 344-353.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ramachandran G. Gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial toxins in sepsis. Virulence 2014; 5(1): 213-218.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J Jr, Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (COMPACCS). Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: Can we meet the requirements of an aging population. JAMA 2000; 284(21): 2762.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Liu Y, Song SD, Wang HX. Pathogenic bacteria distribution and drug resistance of hospital infection-related sepsis in ICU. Chin J Nosocomiol 2010; 20(3): 131-133.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Huang C, WangY, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395(10223): 497-506.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Ziegler EJ, Fisher CJ Jr, Sprung CL, Straube RC, Sadoff JC, Foulke GE, et al. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin-A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med 1991; 324(7): 429-436.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas- Chanoin MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: Results of the European prevalence of infection in intensive care (EPIC) study. JAMA 1995; 274(8): 639-644.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22(7): 707-710.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001; 286(14): 1754.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Medicine Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chinese guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2014. Chin Crit Care Med 2015; 27(6): 401-426.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E, Van Laer M, Claessens YE, Avondo A, et al. Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department. JAMA 2017; 317(3): 301.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Fernando SM, Tran A, Taljaard M, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Seely AJE, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for mortality in patients with suspected infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168(4): 266-275.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Haydar S, Spanier M, Weems P, Wood S, Strout T. Comparison of qSOFA score and SIRS criteria as screening mechanisms for emergency department sepsis. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35(11): 1730-1733.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Hwang SY, Jo IJ, Lee SU, Lee TR, Yoon H, Cha WC, et al. Low accuracy of positive qSOFA criteria for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill septic patients during the early period after emergency department presentation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 71(1): 1-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Churpek MM, Snyder A, Han X, Sokol S, Pettit N, Howell MD, et al. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores for detecting clinical deterioration in infected patients outside the intensive care unit. Am J Resp Crit Care 2017; 195(7): 906-911.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Goulden R, Hoyle MC, Monis J, Railton D, Riley V, Martin P, et al. qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis. Emerg Med J 2018; 35(6): 345-349.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Royal College of Physician. National Early Warning Score(NEWS): Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Wang CY, Cao T, Qin J, Zhang JP, Department of Emergency. Value of England national early warning score in evaluating prognosis of elderly patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department. J Clin Med Pract 2017; 21(15): 1-4.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Zhu YM, Zhang WH. Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in etiological diagnosis of sepsis. J Microbes Infect 2018; 13(2): 97-101.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Gilbert DN, Eliopoulos GM, Chambers HF, Saag MS, Pavia, AT. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy 2018. 48th edition. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Jekarl DW, Kim KS, Lee S, Kim M, Kim Y. Cytokine and molecular networks in sepsis cases: A network biology approach. Eur Cytokine Netw 2018; 29(3): 103-111.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Xia ZF, Wu GS. Role of cytokines in sepsis and its current situation of clinical application. Chin J Burns 2019; 35(1): 3-7.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Yao YM, Zhang YM. Updated insights into the pathogenesis of sepsi. J Med Postgrad 2017; 30(7): 678-683.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Batzofin BM, Sprung CL, Weiss YG. The use of steroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 25(5): 735-743.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Kalil AC , Sun J. Low-dose steroids for septic shock and severe sepsis: The use of Bayesian statistics to resolve clinical trial controversies. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37(3): 420-429.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Heming N, Sivanandamoorthy S, Meng P, Bounab R, Annane D. Immune effects of corticosteroids in sepsis. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1736.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Chinese College of Emergency Physicians of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Shock and Sepsis Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association. Guidelines for emergency treatment of sepsis/septic shock in China (2018). J Clin Emerg 2018; 19(9): 567-588.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Park KH, Lee KH, Kim H. The Anti-inflammatory effects of ulinastatin in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25(1): 128.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Chang XJ, Zhang S, Jiang YP, Chen CM, Chen J, Liu BJ, et al. Mechanism of reduning injection on anti-acute lung injury in rats based on cytokine storm. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs 2015; 46(2): 236-239.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Wang KF, Xiao W, Wang ZZ, Xu LJ, Bi YA, Sun L, et al. Influence of reduning injection on the inflammatory mediums of IL-1, IL-6, ET-1 and PGE2. Chin J Hosp Pharm 2013; 33(23): 1918-1922.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Tang LP, Xiao W, Li YF, Li HB, Wang ZZ, Yao XS, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of reduning injection on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury of rats. Chin J Integr Med 2014; 20(8): 591-599.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Zhao YH. Application of reduning injection in clinical pediatrics. Chin J Obst Gynecol Pediatr (Electronic Edition) 2012; 8(3): 383-385.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Ou Y, Huang YX, Su W, Luo JX, Chen WM, Tang X, et al. Mechanisms of Xuebijing injection in interventing intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction in SAP rats. Guangzhou Med J 2019; 50(3): 1-5.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Lu WJ, Li WZ, Wang X, Liu JY. Expression of TNF-α, TGF-β1 , IL- 13 in lung tissue of rats with paraquat poisoning and intervention of Xuebijing injection. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med 2019; 28(32): 3567-3571.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Sun MJ, Tu YR, Ouyang HZ, Chang YX, He J. Effect of treatment with Xuebijing injection and its pharmacokinetics markers on serum inflammatory factor indude TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 in rats with sepsis. J Tianjin Univ Tradit Chin Med 2018; 37(1): 13-15.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Zhao SB, He XD, Wang HX, Zheng SY, Deng XM, Duan LB. Study on the change rule of serum high mobility group protein B1 in sepsis rats and the intervention effect of Xuebijing. Chin Imaging J Integr Tradit West Med 2014; 34(6): 739-744.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Zhan LX, Zhu GD, Zhang JX, Yang ZL. The changes and the intervening effects of Xuebijing on cell factors ,TH and type 2 deiodinase levels in septic rats. J Pract Med 2018; 34(16): 2670-2674.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Wang Q, Wu X, Tong X, Zhang Z, Xu B, Zhou W. Xuebijing ameliorates sepsis-induced lung injury by downregulating HMGB1 and RAGE expressions in mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015; 2015: 860259.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Li C, Wang P, Zhang L, Li M, Lei X, Liu S, et al. Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection (a Chinese patent) for sepsis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Ethnopharmacol 2018; 224: 512-521.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Song Y, Yao C, Yao Y, Han H, Bai C. Xuebijing injection versus placebo for critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2019; 47(9): e735-e743..  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Wang S, Li LN, Qi WS, Yang XJ, Dong XC. Progress of inflammatory response regulation and sepsis prevention and treatment. Mod Instrum & Med Treat 2018; 24(5): 30-32.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Mathias B, Delmas AL, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Vanzant EL, Szpila BE, Mohr AM, et al. Human myeloid-derived suppressor cells are associated with chronic immune suppression after severe sepsis/septic shock. Ann Surg 2017; 265(4): 827-834.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Shankar-Hari M, Harrison DA, Rubenfeld GD, Rowan K. Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: Comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119(4): 626-636.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Thomas H. Sepsis: Bile acids promote inflammation in cholestasis-associated sepsis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14(6): 324-325.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Huang XB, Liu DH. Research progress of immunosuppression detection and immunotherapy in sepsis. Guangxi Med J 2020; 42(4): 486-490.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Rodelo JR, De la Rosa G, Valencia ML, Ospina S, Arango CM, Gomez CI, et al. D-dimer is a significant prognostic factor in patients with suspected infection and sepsis. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30(9): 1991-1999.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Shen GF, Li X, Ni JD, Wang H. The effects of actue lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome with sepsis in ICU treated with low molecular weight heparin. Chin J Crit Care Med 2016; 36(12): 1130-1132.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Dai LL. Observation of the effect of low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation on patients with sepsis in ICU. J Med Theory Pract 2019; 32(1): 51-52.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, Pike F, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(18): 1683-1693.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(14): 1301-1311.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371(16): 1496-1506.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Emergency Branch of China Association of Chinese Medicine, Chinese College of Emergency Physicians of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Emergency Medicine Committee of the People’s Liberation Army of China, Emergency Committee of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Healthcare. Consensus of emergency experts on fluid therapy for sepsis. Chin J Emerg Med 2018; 27(1): 30-38.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Raghunathan K, Nailer P, Konoske R. What is the ideal crystalloid? Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21(4): 309-314.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Demling R, Lalonde C, Saldinger P, Knox J. Multiple-organ dysfunction in the surgical patient: Pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment. Curr Probl Surg 1993; 30(4): 345-414.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Zhang YP, Han P. New progress in the study of anti-endotoxin of traditional Chinese Medicine. Chin J TCM WM Crit Care 2001; 8(2): 122.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Meng M, Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. New insights into the gut as the driver of critical illness and organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017; 23(2): 143-148.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Wang HF, Wang FY, Chang P, Liu ZG. Intestinal microecology and sepsis. Chin J Crit Care Med (Electronic Edition) 2018; 11(6): 415-419.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Yu DF, Weng YY, Xu J, Hu MH, Jin D, Zhang G. Effects of Da Chengqi decoction on inflammatory responses and immunologic function of severe sepsis patients with ventilation. Chin J Tradit Med Sci Technol 2011; 18(3): 181-182.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Yin Q, Li CH. Treatment effects of Xuebijing injection in severe septic patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014; 2014: 949254.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Jin M, Li CS. The effect of Xuebijing injection on coagulation and prognosis in severe sepsis. Chin J Intern Med 2009; 48(3): 235-236.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Guo CX,Yang XY, Lin ZF, Zhao L, Shan HW, Chen DC, et al. Clinical observation on effects of Shengmai injection on plasma vasoactive mediators in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Chin J TCM WM Crit Care 2004; 11(4): 239-241.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Chen DC, Jing BW, Yang XY, Song ZF, Yan M, Zhao L, et al. Protective effect of rhubarb on gastrointestinal tract in critically ill patients. Chin Crit Care Med 2000; 12(2): 87-89.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.
Chen DC, Ma LQ, Liu SZ. Effects of rhubarb on intestinal flora and bacterial translocation in rats with sepsis. Chin Crit Care Med 2009; 21(1): 17-20.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.
Wang HM, Sun RQ, Zhang SL. An experimental research on salvianolate for prevention and treatment of acute lung injury in rats. Chin J TCM WM Crit Care 2011; 18(2): 110-112.  Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.
Huang ZF, Chen DC, Chen RK, Li YJ. Effects of ginsenosides on cyto-immunologic function in scalded rats with sepsis. Chin J TCM WM Crit Care 2006; 13(4): 225-227.  Back to cited text no. 90
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  2. Diagnosis of ...3. Screening of ...4. Diagnosis and...5. Prevention of...
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
6. Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1052    
    Printed21    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded87    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal